Analysis for Technology Acceptance of Internal Apps at Regency Level in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/josapen.v2i2.34Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model, Government Institutions, Regency Level IndonesiaAbstract
This study investigates the factors influencing technology acceptance of internal applications within regency-level government institutions in Indonesia, utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The analysis focuses on key variables including perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), attitude toward using (ATU), behavioural intention to use (BITU), and actual system usage (ASU). The results reveal strong correlations across all variables, indicating a high level of acceptance and positive engagement with the apps among government employees. Additionally, reliability testing shows high internal consistency, with Cronbach's Alpha values exceeding 0.9 for most variables, confirming the stability and dependability of the measurements. These findings suggest that government employees generally find the internal apps beneficial and user-friendly, leading to favorable attitudes and continued usage. This research provides valuable insights that can inform the development and implementation of future digital initiatives at the regency level in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
V. Venkatesh and F. Davis, “A theoretical extension of the tecgnology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies University of Maryland at College Park,” Manage. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000.
Y. B. Hermanto, V. A. Srimulyani, and D. J. Pitoyo, “The mediating role of quality of work life and organizational commitment in the link between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, p. e27664, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27664.
P. Dirgahayani, A. P. Yesuari, T. R. Wulansari, and H. Sutanto, “The formation of network governance in accelerating the implementation of TOD: The case of Jakarta MRT Phase 1, Indonesia,” Case Stud. Transp. Policy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1412–1425, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2020.10.006.
A. J. P. Sanders et al., “Unrelenting games: Multiple negotiations and landscape transformations in the tropical peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia,” World Dev., vol. 117, pp. 196–210, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.008.
D. Pande and A. Taeihagh, “A governance perspective on user acceptance of autonomous systems in Singapore,” Technol. Soc., vol. 77, no. March 2022, p. 102580, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102580.
H. Jo and Y. Bang, “Understanding continuance intention of enterprise resource planning (ERP): TOE, TAM, and IS success model,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, p. e21019, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21019.
T. Shal, N. Ghamrawi, and H. Naccache, “Leadership styles and AI acceptance in academic libraries in higher education,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 50, no. 2, p. 102849, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102849.
M. Maghsoudi and N. Nezafati, “Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in organizations: A system dynamics approach,” Telemat. Informatics Reports, vol. 11, no. May 2023, p. 100070, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2023.100070.
C. Zhang, “How can rural China achieve sustainable development through inclusive innovation? A tripartite evolutionary game analysis,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 469, no. April, p. 143126, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143126.
M. Mukred, U. A. Mokhtar, B. Hawash, H. AlSalman, and M. Zohaib, “The adoption and use of learning analytics tools to improve decision making in higher learning institutions: An extension of technology acceptance model,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e26315, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26315.
M. Rouidi, A. E. Elouadi, A. Hamdoune, K. Choujtani, and A. Chati, “TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: A systematic review,” Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 32, no. March, p. 101008, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101008.
S. R. Natasia, Y. T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, “Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 512–520, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168.
Y. C. Huang, L. N. Li, H. Y. Lee, M. H. E. M. Browning, and C. P. Yu, “Surfing in virtual reality: An application of extended technology acceptance model with flow theory,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 100252, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100252.
I. Y. Alyoussef, “Acceptance of a flipped classroom to improve university students’ learning: An empirical study on the TAM model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT),” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 12, p. e12529, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12529.
B. Gao and L. Huang, “Understanding interactive user behavior in smart media content service: An integration of TAM and smart service belief factors,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 12, p. e02983, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02983.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ines
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
