Beyond the Classroom: MOOCs and the Evolution of Lifelong Learning
Keywords:
MOOCs, Lifelong Learning, Educational Paradigms, Distance LearningAbstract
This study explores the transformative impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) on lifelong learning, challenging traditional education paradigms and offering accessible, flexible, and global learning opportunities. Focusing on the dynamics, challenges, and potentials associated with MOOCs, the research emphasizes their role in shaping education beyond conventional classroom settings. The study employs a multidimensional analysis, combining a comprehensive literature review, empirical research methods, and a discussion of findings to provide nuanced insights. Key findings reveal that MOOCs, characterized by massive scalability and interactive features, reach a global audience and engage learners dynamically. However, challenges such as completion rates, learner engagement, quality assurance, access, monetization, and integration persist, necessitating strategic interventions. The study identifies the potential of MOOCs to revolutionize education by offering global accessibility, supporting lifelong learning, accommodating diverse learning styles, integrating innovative technologies, bridging industry-relevant skills gaps, and fostering collaborative learning communities. In conclusion, MOOCs stand at the forefront of the educational landscape, poised to play a pivotal role in the future of education. The article recommends practical strategies for stakeholders to enhance MOOC accessibility, improve learner engagement, address certification concerns, and integrate these platforms into formal education systems. Embracing the transformative power of MOOCs is crucial for building a global learning community that thrives on accessibility, innovation, and continuous learning in the evolving digital era.
Downloads
References
C. Rodrigo, F. Iniesto, and A. Garcia-serrano, “Heliyon Applying andragogy for integrating a MOOC into a formal online learning experience in computer engineering,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, p. e23493, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23493.
M. J. Gomez, M. Calderón, V. Sánchez, F. J. G. Clemente, and J. A. Ruipérez-Valiente, “Large scale analysis of open MOOC reviews to support learners’ course selection,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 210, no. July, p. 118400, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118400.
M. Floss et al., “An international planetary health for primary care massive open online course,” Lancet Planet. Heal., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. e172–e178, 2023, doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00307-2.
F. J. Frandsen, “Accumulating and communicating research: Development of a Massive Open Online Course on ash,” Fuel, vol. 343, no. December 2022, p. 127708, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127708.
R. Alatrash, M. A. Chatti, Q. Ul Ain, Y. Fang, S. Joarder, and C. Siepmann, “ConceptGCN: Knowledge concept recommendation in MOOCs based on knowledge graph convolutional networks and SBERT,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. July 2023, p. 100193, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100193.
C. Wrigley, G. Mosely, and M. Tomitsch, “Design Thinking Education: A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses,” She Ji, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 275–292, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002.
A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, no. May, pp. 275–285, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
G. Ibarra-Vazquez, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, M. Buenestado-Fernández, and G. Olague, “Predicting open education competency level: A machine learning approach,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e20597, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20597.
J. Xi, Y. Chen, and G. Wang, “Design of a personalized massive open online course platform,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 58–70, 2018, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v13i04.8470.
R. Yilmaz et al., “Smart MOOC integrated with intelligent tutoring: A system architecture and framework model proposal,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. July, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100092.
X. Wei, N. Saab, and W. Admiraal, “Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 56, no. July 2021, p. 100880, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100880.
M. Senevirathne, D. Amaratunga, R. Haigh, D. Kumer, and A. Kaklauskas, “A common framework for MOOC curricular development in climate change education - Findings and adaptations under the BECK project for higher education institutions in Europe and Asia,” Prog. Disaster Sci., vol. 14, no. March, p. 100222, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100222.
R. A. Hendriks, P. G. M. de Jong, W. F. Admiraal, and M. E. J. Reinders, “Motivation for learning in campus-integrated MOOCs: Self-determined students, grade hunters and teacher trusters,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 6, no. October 2023, p. 100158, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100158.
S. Ahmadi, Z. Nourmohamadzadeh, and B. Amiri, “A hybrid DEMATEL and social network analysis model to identify factors affecting learners’ satisfaction with MOOCs,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e17894, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17894.
J. Guggemos, L. Moser, and S. Seufert, “Learners don’t know best: Shedding light on the phenomenon of the K-12 MOOC in the context of information literacy,” Comput. Educ., vol. 188, no. May, p. 104552, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104552.
M. J. Gomez, M. Calderón, V. Sánchez, F. J. G. Clemente, and J. A. Ruipérez-Valiente, “Large scale analysis of open MOOC reviews to support learners’ course selection,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 210, no. July, p. 118400, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118400.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adriel Moses Anson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
