E-learning platforms for boarding schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v2i2.40Keywords:
E-learning platforms, Boarding schools, Digital literacyAbstract
This study examines the adoption and impact of e-learning platforms in boarding schools. Boarding schools present unique educational challenges, making them a compelling case for exploring the effectiveness of digital learning solutions. The study begins with a comprehensive needs assessment involving stakeholders such as administrators, teachers, students, and IT staff. Key areas of focus include technological infrastructure, internet accessibility, and digital literacy levels. The study then moves to the implementation phase, piloting an e-learning platform in select schools to evaluate its effectiveness. Results indicate significant challenges, including outdated infrastructure and varying levels of digital literacy. However, e-learning platforms show promise in enhancing educational outcomes by offering interactive content and improving communication. The study compares different platforms, such as Google Classroom, Moodle, and Microsoft Teams, to determine the most suitable options for these institutions. Findings suggest that while some platforms are more user-friendly, others offer robust customization and scalability, making them better suited for the specific needs of boarding schools.
Downloads
References
D. G. Giday and E. Perumal, “Students’ perception of attending online learning sessions post-pandemic,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 9, no. November 2023, p. 100755, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100755.
M. A. Al-Gerafi et al., “Designing of an effective e-learning website using inter-valued fuzzy hybrid MCDM concept: A pedagogical approach,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 97, no. March, pp. 61–87, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.012.
H. Taherdoost and M. Madanchian, “Employment of Technological-Based Approaches for Creative E-Learning; Teaching Management Information Systems,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 215, pp. 802–808, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.082.
M. Zareisaroukolaei, G. Shams, M. RezaeiZadeh, and M. Ghahramani, “Effectiveness evaluation indicators of organizational E-learning courses,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 15, no. May, p. 100432, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100432.
M. K. Hossen and M. S. Uddin, “Attention monitoring of students during online classes using XGBoost classifier,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. December, p. 100191, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100191.
S. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, T. Tran, and Z. Du, “Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 252, no. PA, p. 124167, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.
Z. Zen, Reflianto, Syamsuar, and F. Ariani, “Academic achievement: the effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 11, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509.
E. Alieto, B. Abequibel-Encarnacion, E. Estigoy, K. Balasa, A. Eijansantos, and A. Torres-Toukoumidis, “Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 2, p. e24282, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24282.
D. Herlo, “‘Consumer Classroom’ European Website, an Interactive Tool for Consumer Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 180, no. November 2014, pp. 1489–1497, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.297.
M. Raspopović, S. Cvetanović, D. Stanojević, and M. Opačić, “Software architecture for integration of institutional and social learning environments,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 129, pp. 92–102, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2016.07.001.
J. Jayabalan, M. Dorasamy, and M. Raman, “Reshaping higher educational institutions through frugal open innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 145, 2021, doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020145.
S. T. K. Chan and G. D. Smith, “Strategies for enhancing Chinese students’ engagement in a large class learning environment: An interpretative phenomenological approach,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 78, no. June, p. 104023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104023.
D. Benta, G. Bologa, and I. Dzitac, “E-learning platforms in higher education. Case study,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 31, pp. 1170–1176, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.373.
S. R. Natasia, Y. T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, “Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, no. 2021, pp. 512–520, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168.
K. E. Brown et al., “Novel e-learning platform for orthopaedic training in LMICs: A descriptive review of the IGOT portal,” Surg. Open Sci., vol. 13, pp. 24–26, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.04.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitrah Karimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
