The Tender Auction System: Secure Transactions for Goods and Services

Authors

  • Rachman Fangki Indo Global Mandiri University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v2i1.28

Keywords:

Tender auction system, goods and services, procurement processes

Abstract

This study examines the development and implementation of a tender auction system designed to enhance the security, transparency, and efficiency of procurement processes. The shift from traditional paper-based tendering to electronic platforms has introduced both opportunities and challenges, particularly concerning transaction security. The research highlights the need for robust security measures to safeguard against fraud, data breaches, and other vulnerabilities that could compromise the integrity of the tendering process. Through a structured approach involving problem identification, literature review, system design, and rigorous testing, the study successfully develops a tender auction system that ensures secure transactions. The system’s functionality, including user authentication, data management, and reporting, was validated through blackbox testing, confirming its reliability. The findings underscore the system's effectiveness in maintaining secure and transparent procurement processes, contributing to greater trust among stakeholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Kruger, “A quiet transition: The role of Namibia’s state-owned power utility in the renewable energy auction program,” Util. Policy, vol. 78, no. July, p. 101392, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2022.101392.

I. G. Özbilgin and M. Y. Imamoǧlu, “The impact of dynamic purchasing systems in the electronic public procurement processes,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1571–1575, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.051.

P. K. Singh and S. W. Chan, “The Impact of Electronic Procurement Adoption on Green Procurement towards Sustainable Supply Chain Performance-Evidence from Malaysian ISO Organizations,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 61, 2022, doi: 10.3390/joitmc8020061.

P. Mac Clay, J. Börner, and J. Sellare, “Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity,” Energy Policy, vol. 180, no. May, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113685.

M. Moshtari, N. Altay, J. Heikkilä, and P. Gonçalves, “Procurement in humanitarian organizations: Body of knowledge and practitioner’s challenges,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 233, no. January, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108017.

T. Nodehi, A. Zutshi, A. Grilo, and B. Rizvanovic, “EBDF: The enterprise blockchain design framework and its application to an e-Procurement ecosystem,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 171, no. June, p. 108360, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108360.

J. M. Spreitzenbarth, C. Bode, and H. Stuckenschmidt, “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in purchasing and supply management: A mixed-methods review of the state-of-the-art in literature and practice,” J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 30, no. 1, p. 100896, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100896.

N. Fabra, “Reforming European electricity markets: Lessons from the energy crisis,” Energy Econ., vol. 126, no. April, p. 106963, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106963.

B. Memarian and T. Doleck, “Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. May, p. 100152, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152.

E. Seid, S. Satheesh, O. Popov, and F. Blix, “FAIR: Cyber Security Risk Quantification In Logistics Sector,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 237, pp. 783–792, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.166.

K. Fan, C. Zhou, N. Lu, W. Shi, and V. Chang, “Internet of Things A fair multi-attribute data transaction mechanism supporting,” Internet of Things, vol. 28, no. April, p. 101339, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2024.101339.

K. Sokol, R. Santos-Rodriguez, and P. Flach, “FAT Forensics: A Python toolbox for algorithmic fairness, accountability and transparency[Formula presented],” Softw. Impacts, vol. 14, no. August, p. 100406, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.simpa.2022.100406.

T. Zhang, D. Wei, M. Zhu, S. Gu, and Y. Zheng, “Jou rna pro of,” Med. Image Anal., p. 103151, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2024.101357.

M. Lokanan and S. Sharma, “The use of machine learning algorithms to predict financial statement fraud,” Br. Account. Rev., no. July, p. 101441, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2024.101441.

M. Luna, S. Fernandez-Vazquez, E. Tereñes Castelao, and Á. Arias Fernández, “A blockchain-based approach to the challenges of EU’s environmental policy compliance in aquaculture: From traceability to fraud prevention,” Mar. Policy, vol. 159, no. January 2023, pp. 0–3, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105892.

Published

2024-02-27

How to Cite

Fangki, R. (2024). The Tender Auction System: Secure Transactions for Goods and Services. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Teknik Informatika (JAFOTIK), 2(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v2i1.28

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.