Administrative Service System for the Community in Tanjung Kerang Village
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v1i2.20Keywords:
Community administration services, Software development, Service delivery improvementAbstract
In this study, the challenges faced by Tanjung Kerang Village in providing optimal community administration services using conventional methods are highlighted. The village, despite having a relatively large population, faces issues such as long queues, delays due to forgotten requirements, and difficulties in accessing data for administrative processes. To address these challenges, the study proposes the implementation of a community service administration information system using the Prototype Model in software development. The Prototype Model, characterized by quick iterations, user involvement, and continuous refinement, is chosen as the methodology for system development. This approach allows for the creation of a preliminary version of the software that undergoes testing and refinement in multiple cycles. The iterative nature of the model, coupled with user feedback, facilitates the gradual convergence towards a final, fully functional system. In conclusion, the Prototype Model proves instrumental in addressing the identified challenges, offering a systematic and iterative approach to enhance community administration services. The proposed information system has the potential to significantly improve service delivery, making it more effective and efficient for both administrators and the community.
Downloads
References
A. Adamy and H. A. Rani, “An evaluation of community satisfaction with the government’s COVID-19 pandemic response in Aceh, Indonesia,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 69, no. 91, p. 102723, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102723.
D. P. Pant, B. Acharya, and M. R. Kattel, “Association of government effectiveness, logistics performance, IT systems and income with COVID-19 mortality,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e15214, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15214.
M. Riesener et al., “A model for dependency-oriented prototyping in the agile development of complex technical systems,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 84, no. March, pp. 1023–1028, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.196.
A. Rizzardi, S. Sicari, and A. Coen-Porisini, “Towards rapid modeling and prototyping of indoor and outdoor monitoring applications,” Sustain. Comput. Informatics Syst., vol. 41, no. December 2023, p. 100951, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100951.
C. Smyth, S. H. Xie, T. Zaborniak, M. Fellows, C. Phillips, and W. A. Kurz, “Development of a prototype modeling system to estimate the GHG mitigation potential of forest and wildfire management,” MethodsX, vol. 10, no. October 2022, p. 101985, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101985.
G. Bergström et al., “Evaluating the layout quality of UML class diagrams using machine learning,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 192, p. 111413, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111413.
H. Wu, “QMaxUSE: A new tool for verifying UML class diagrams and OCL invariants,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 228, p. 102955, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2023.102955.
P. Danenas, T. Skersys, and R. Butleris, “Natural language processing-enhanced extraction of SBVR business vocabularies and business rules from UML use case diagrams,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 128, no. February, p. 101822, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2020.101822.
Meiliana, I. Septian, R. S. Alianto, Daniel, and F. L. Gaol, “Automated Test Case Generation from UML Activity Diagram and Sequence Diagram using Depth First Search Algorithm,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 629–637, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.029.
Z. Daw and R. Cleaveland, “Comparing model checkers for timed UML activity diagrams,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 111, no. P2, pp. 277–299, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2015.05.008.
F. Chen, L. Zhang, X. Lian, and N. Niu, “Automatically recognizing the semantic elements from UML class diagram images,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 193, p. 111431, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111431.
D. Felicio, J. Simao, and N. Datia, “Rapitest: Continuous black-box testing of restful web apis,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 219, no. 2022, pp. 537–545, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.322.
H. Bostani and V. Moonsamy, “EvadeDroid: A Practical Evasion Attack on Machine Learning for Black-box Android Malware Detection,” Comput. Secur., p. 103676, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2023.103676.
F. Pagano, A. Romdhana, D. Caputo, L. Verderame, and A. Merlo, “SEBASTiAn: A static and extensible black-box application security testing tool for iOS and Android applications,” SoftwareX, vol. 23, p. 101448, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2023.101448.
C. Cronley et al., “Designing and evaluating a smartphone app to increase underserved communities’ data representation in transportation policy and planning,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 18, no. January, p. 100763, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100763.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Adi Zamrozi, A Sanmarino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
