Optimizing Educational Delivery: Cloud-Based Solutions for Effective Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v1i2.16Keywords:
Distance Education, Cloud Based Solutions, Accessibility, Teacher-Student Interaction, Increased Educational ContentAbstract
This paper explores the transformative role of cloud-based technology in revolutionizing distance education, emphasizing its pivotal significance in a rapidly evolving educational landscape. Amid global challenges and technological advancements, particularly in cloud computing, the paper underscores the critical role cloud technology plays in optimizing learning material delivery and fostering interactions within the educational sphere, especially in the context of distance learning. Through an in-depth analysis, this study investigates the adoption and optimization of cloud-based technology by educational institutions to surmount accessibility barriers, elevate learning quality, and offer more interactive and inclusive learning experiences. By evaluating the adaptability of cloud-based solutions, the paper highlights their potential not only in facilitating learning but also in stimulating innovation within the education sector. Moreover, the research delves into essential elements such as security, infrastructure, and technical support necessary for successful cloud technology implementation in educational environments. As a foundational exploration, this study provides valuable insights and guidance, laying the groundwork for further research aimed at achieving more effective and inclusive education in the digital era.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Q. Zhang, H. Guo, Q. Zhang, and H. Guo, “ScienceDirect Available ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Investigation on Innovative Models of Computer Laboratories Investigation on Innovative Models of Computer Laboratories Based on Cloud Computing Based on Cloud Computing,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 228, pp. 383–390, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.044.
A. Dukhanov, M. Karpova, and K. Bochenina, “Design virtual learning labs for courses in computational science with use of cloud computing technologies,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 29, pp. 2472–2482, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.231.
M. A. El-rashidy, N. A. Khodeir, A. Farouk, H. K. Aslan, and N. A. El-fishawy, “Attention-based contextual local and global features for urgent posts classification in MOOCs discussion forums,” Ain Shams Eng. J., no. May, p. 102605, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102605.
F. Parra, A. Jacobs, and L. L. Trevino, “Shippy Express: Augmenting accounting education with Google Sheets,” J. Account. Educ., vol. 56, p. 100740, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100740.
A. Banerjee et al., “Tracking 21st century climate dynamics of the Third Pole: An analysis of topo-climate impacts on snow cover in the central Himalaya using Google Earth Engine,” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., vol. 103, no. July, p. 102490, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102490.
A. Rajaram et al., “An integrated virtual pathology education platform developed using Microsoft Power Apps and Microsoft Teams,” J. Pathol. Inform., vol. 13, no. May, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100117.
B. Ly, R. Ly, and S. Hor, “Zoom classrooms and adoption behavior among Cambodian students,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 9, no. December 2022, p. 100266, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100266.
S. Vandenberg and M. Magnuson, “A comparison of student and faculty attitudes on the use of Zoom, a video conferencing platform: A mixed-methods study,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 54, no. April, p. 103138, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103138.
A. Laflen, “Exploring how response technologies shape instructor feedback: A comparison of Canvas Speedgrader, Google Docs, and Turnitin GradeMark,” Comput. Compos., vol. 68, p. 102777, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102777.
K. Dobashi, C. P. Ho, C. P. Fulford, M. F. Grace Lin, and C. Higa, “Learning pattern classification using moodle logs and the visualization of browsing processes by time-series cross-section,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. November, p. 100105, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100105.
A. David, D. Mihai, M. E. Mihailescu, M. Carabas, and N. Tapus, “Scalability through Distributed Deployment for Moodle Learning Management System,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 214, no. C, pp. 34–41, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.145.
F. Iqbal, Z. Khalid, A. Marrington, B. Shah, and P. C. K. Hung, “Forensic investigation of Google Meet for memory and browser artifacts,” Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig., vol. 43, p. 301448, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301448.
T. Takura, I. Komuro, and M. Ono, “Trends in the cost-effectiveness level of percutaneous coronary intervention: Macro socioeconomic analysis and health technology assessment,” J. Cardiol., vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 356–363, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.011.
D. Aguirre-Guerrero, G. Ducoffe, L. Fàbrega, P. Vilà, and D. Coudert, “Low time complexity algorithms for path computation in Cayley Graphs,” Discret. Appl. Math., vol. 259, pp. 218–225, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.12.005.
I. Sivignon, “Fast recognition of a Digital Straight Line subsegment: Two algorithms of logarithmic time complexity,” Discret. Appl. Math., vol. 183, pp. 130–146, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2014.04.017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asiyah Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
