Decision Support System for Determining Underprivileged Communities as a Government Guide in the Family Hope Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v2i1.30Keywords:
Decision Support System, Family Hope Program (PKH), TOPSISAbstract
This study addresses the economic disparity in Indonesia by enhancing the selection process for beneficiaries of the Family Hope Program (PKH), a government initiative providing financial assistance to very poor households. Traditionally, the selection process is manual and prone to inefficiency and fraud. To improve objectivity and accuracy, a Decision Support System (DSS) utilizing the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method is proposed. TOPSIS ranks households based on multiple welfare criteria, such as income, housing conditions, and basic amenities, identifying those closest to the ideal solution. The system effectively prioritizes aid distribution by assigning a closeness coefficient to each household, enabling a more efficient allocation of resources. The results show that households with the highest coefficients, such as V1 (0.637367819), are prioritized for assistance, while those with lower scores, like V7 (0.139295032), are ranked lower. This method ensures that government aid reaches the most underprivileged communities.
Downloads
References
N. Latif, R. Rafeeq, N. Safdar, K. Younas, M. A. Gardezi, and S. Ahmad, “Unraveling the Nexus: The impact of economic globalization on the environment in Asian economies,” Res. Glob., vol. 7, no. October, p. 100169, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100169.
A. Sekaringtias, B. Verrier, and J. Cronin, “Untangling the socio-political knots: A systems view on Indonesia’s inclusive energy transitions,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 95, no. December 2022, p. 102911, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102911.
R. E. de Vos, A. Suwarno, M. Slingerland, P. J. van der Meer, and J. M. Lucey, “Pre-certification conditions of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Assessing prospects for RSPO certification,” Land use policy, vol. 130, no. June 2021, p. 106660, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106660.
H. Ryu et al., “A web-based decision support system (DSS) for hydrogen refueling station location and supply chain optimization,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 93, pp. 36223–36239, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.064.
Ž. Južnič-Zonta, A. Guisasola, and J. A. Baeza, “Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS): Defining a multi-criteria decision-making framework for the selection of WWTP configurations with resource recovery,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 367, no. May, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873.
Z. Dulcic, D. Pavlic, and I. Silic, “Evaluating the Intended Use of Decision Support System (DSS) by Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Business Organizations in Croatia,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 58, pp. 1565–1575, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1143.
S. Esposito, A. Cafiero, F. Giannino, S. Mazzoleni, and M. M. Diano, “A Monitoring, Modeling and Decision Support System (DSS) for a Microalgae Production Plant based on Internet of Things Structure,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 113, pp. 519–524, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.316.
G. Anzaldi et al., “Towards an enhanced knowledge-based Decision Support System (DSS) for integrated water resource management (IWRM),” Procedia Eng., vol. 89, pp. 1097–1104, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.230.
S. Nasirin, I. A. A. Bahar, N. Mohd. Tuah, A. Kadir, C. Salimun, and S. Yussof, “Examining Decision Support Systems (DSS) Verification Approaches of the Government Agencies in East Malaysia,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 234, no. 2023, pp. 1546–1552, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.156.
F. B. N. Tonle et al., “A road map for developing novel decision support system (DSS) for disseminating integrated pest management (IPM) technologies,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 217, no. November 2023, p. 108526, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108526.
Y. Li et al., “Distribution of geothermal resources in Eryuan County based on entropy weight TOPSIS and AHP‒TOPSIS methods,” Nat. Gas Ind. B, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–226, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2024.03.002.
S. Sathiyamurthi, M. Sivasakthi, S. Saravanan, R. Gobi, S. Praveen kumar, and S. Karuppannan, “Assessment of crop suitability analysis using AHP-TOPSIS and geospatial techniques: A case study of Krishnagiri District, India,” Environ. Sustain. Indic., vol. 24, no. August, p. 100466, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2024.100466.
S. C and S. K. Subramaniam, “Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e26374, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26374.
F. Akram, T. Ahmad, and M. Sadiq, “An integrated fuzzy adjusted cosine similarity and TOPSIS based recommendation system for information system requirements selection,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 11, no. December 2023, p. 100443, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100443.
W. Chanpuypetch, J. Niemsakul, W. Atthirawong, and T. Supeekit, “An integrated AHP-TOPSIS approach for bamboo product evaluation and selection in rural communities,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 12, no. November 2023, p. 100503, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100503.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elsa Marindi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
