Media Pembelajaran Ilmu Fiqih Menggunakan Metode Contextual Teaching and Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Santri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70356/jafotik.v1i1.3Keywords:
Learning media, Students' interest in learning, Contextual teaching and learningAbstract
Today's technology is developing very rapidly so that conventional learning methods can be hybrid with technology-based learning methods. The process of learning jurisprudence at the Jami'atul Qurro' Islamic Boarding School in Palembang still uses conventional methods, namely the teaching and learning process between Santri and Ustadz is only carried out through meetings in the classroom. Therefore, to be able to help teachers distribute their teaching materials to make them more interactive and informative, without having to be in class and to increase students' interest in learning, a Fiqh Science Learning Media Application based on the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Method is used. With this learning media, it is hoped that it will make it easier for students to repeat the material explained by Ustadz wherever and whenever so that it can increase students' interest in learning at the Jami'atul Qurro' Palembang Islamic Boarding School.
Downloads
References
M. Asrol, M. Yani, P. Papilo, and S. Mursida, “ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Design of intelligent decision support system for supply chain sustainability assessment,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 227, pp. 659–669, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.570.
S. Najihi, S. Elhadi, R. A. Abdelouahid, and A. Marzak, “Software Testing from an Agile and Traditional view,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 203, pp. 775–782, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.116.
K. D. Prasetya, Suharjito, and D. Pratama, “Effectiveness Analysis of Distributed Scrum Model Compared to Waterfall approach in Third-Party Application Development,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 179, no. 2019, pp. 103–111, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.12.014.
T. Thesing, C. Feldmann, and M. Burchardt, “Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, pp. 746–756, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227.
A. A. S. Gunawan, B. Clemons, I. F. Halim, K. Anderson, and M. P. Adianti, “Development of e-butler: Introduction of robot system in hospitality with mobile application,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 216, no. 2019, pp. 67–76, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.112.
C. A. Silva, R. Vilaça, A. Pereira, and R. J. Bessa, “A review on the decarbonization of high-performance computing centers,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 189, no. PB, p. 114019, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114019.
A. Montessori et al., “Thread-safe lattice Boltzmann for high-performance computing on GPUs,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 74, no. October, p. 102165, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102165.
L. Zhu et al., “Monte Carlo performance study of virtual high performance computing cluster over cloud,” Radiat. Med. Prot., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 108–114, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.radmp.2022.07.003.
G. Bergström et al., “Evaluating the layout quality of UML class diagrams using machine learning,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 192, p. 111413, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111413.
H. Wu, “QMaxUSE: A new tool for verifying UML class diagrams and OCL invariants,” Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 228, p. 102955, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2023.102955.
R. K. Swain, V. Panthi, and P. K. Behera, “Test Case Design Using Slicing of UML Interaction Diagram,” Procedia Technol., vol. 6, pp. 136–144, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.10.017.
I. Barashev, “Translating Semantic Networks to UML Class Diagrams,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 96, pp. 946–950, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.085.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siddiq Umary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
